Turkish parties' objection to the tripartite agreement with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

A number of Turkish political parties criticized the country's tripartite defense agreement with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and warned about its consequences for Turkey's national security and the possibility of the country's army being dragged into regional conflicts.

Ambassador Arjan-International Group: These political parties condemned the tripartite agreement that was signed between Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and emphasized that this alliance puts the Turkish army under the domination of America and Israel and leads it to serve Washington and Tel Aviv for the oil of the region.

These parties also warned about the danger of abusing the religious sentiments of Muslims and stressed that this coalition will lead the Turkish army to a war without clear borders.

In this context, Mesavat Darwishoglu, the head of the "Good Party" of Turkey, questioned the fate of the joint defense alliance between Turkey and Saudi Arabia and the extent of his country's army's involvement in the war against the Yemeni people under false pretenses and condemned it and said: "Will the Turkish soldier pay for the political choices of other countries?" Why do we base our foreign policy choices on Riyadh's priorities? Why is Turkey drawn to new military commitments that have no known limits, no clear threats, and no clear final costs?"

Darvishoglu added: Leave the talk of "the servant of the Holy Harams"; We know very well that this issue - including the inclusion of the name Makkah (Mukarmah) on the agreement - was done with the aim of exploiting our religious feelings.

He warned those who seek to abuse the religious feelings of Muslims and said: "The problem is not Makkah and we should not fall into the trap of the American-Israeli alliance that has taken root in our region."

Dervisoglu emphasized that the government should not be allowed to trap Turkey in the trap that the United States and the Zionist regime have spread to dominate the region and its resources.

He raised the question, "Are we going to serve the insatiable appetite of American and Israeli oil companies while pretending to confront America and Israel?"

Darvişoğlu emphasized that he will do his best to ensure that none of the Turkish soldiers are harmed for the sake of the idolaters of this era.

He then asked the Turkish government, "If you cannot provide security for your ships and defend your sailors in the Black Sea, what security guarantee do you offer to another country?" "You talk about the security of the Saudis, but you are silent when it comes to the security of Turkish citizens in the Black Sea."

On the other hand, Ahmet Ozbay, the head of Turkey's "Motherland Party" branch in Antalya, said that the tripartite coalition statement issued in Riyadh on October 5 (13 Mehr) contains signs of US and Israel's involvement.

He asked the government of his country to withdraw from this agreement, which puts the Turkish army under regional and foreign domination.

In this context, "Samra Dincer", the vice president of the Republican People's Party of Turkey, emphasized that the "Mecca Agreement" was signed without its contents being known and has not yet been submitted to the Turkish Parliament.

He emphasized that he will not support any agreement that endangers the interests and security of Turkey.

According to Al-Masira network, these positions are raised in the midst of increasing political protests in Turkey along with public dissatisfaction with the consequences of the tripartite agreement and concern about the consequences of such an agreement on Turkey's national security.

The defense agreement between the three countries of the region is still in the center of attention; The President of Turkey gave a new explanation about the goals and framework of this agreement by rejecting some perceptions.

A Yemeni Ansarullah official warned: Enemies targeting Iran will not be limited to the borders of this country, and according to him, the next attempts will be to target Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan.

The expansion of the war to Pakistan, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia, which have not been directly involved so far, can change the scene of the American-Israeli war. Of course, the entry of any country into war needs to arouse and justify the public opinion, and this itself has a basic foundation, and that is the household economy.