Shariatmadari Lashes Out at Zarif, Rouhani and Marashi / America Has Dozens of Ambassadors in Iran

Hossein Shariatmadari, editor-in-chief of Kayhan newspaper, in a column criticizing the positions of Mohammad Javad Zarif, Hossein Marashi and Hassan Rouhani on war, negotiations and how to deal with the United States, claimed that these three figures are playing the role of “America's ambassadors” in Iran.

In a sharp note, Hossein Shariatmadari, the editor-in-chief of Kayhan newspaper, severely criticized Zarif's positions on the Turkmanchai treaty, Marashy's statements about avoiding war, and Rouhani's proposal about the referendum, and wrote:

1- A few years ago, "John Negroponte", the successor of "Paul Bremer", the first American policy-making commander in Iraq after Saddam, who later became responsible for directing the "American intelligence and security community", shortly before the end of his mission, asked one of the Iraqi political leaders: "Do you know why there is never a coup in America?!" And the Iraqi official listed many reasons, from distribution of power to democracy, etc., but Negroponte told him in one sentence: "Only because America does not have an embassy in Washington"!

2- Although John Negroponte sarcastically emphasizes that the main mission of American embassies in non-aligned countries is a coup against the host country and changing its sovereignty, there is a reality hidden in this irony that can be clearly seen only with a cursory review of the activities of American embassies in non-aligned countries. The documents obtained from the occupied American embassy in Tehran also confirm this fact. Therefore, the capture of the American embassy should be considered as countering one of the biggest conspiracies of the United States against the Islamic Revolution. An action that Imam Rahel mentioned as "a revolution beyond the first revolution" and the Martyr Leader of the Revolution described it as a "defensive, timely and completely rational move". The American embassy in Islamic Iran was closed, but this story has a long head. Read!

3- The main and defined mission of an embassy is to secure and protect the interests of the country that the embassy is in charge of, and this mission is managed by the ambassador, who is the highest official of the embassy. With this account, it can be said that those who support America's interests inside the country and in their words and writings, express the wishes of Trump on earth, whether they know it or not, they have assumed the role of American ambassadors and fill the vacant position of the American ambassador! Don't be surprised! Isn't it the duty of the ambassador of a country to defend and support the interests and demands of his country? Well, if that is the case, what is the difference between the mentioned people and the American ambassador in Iran?! Just pay attention to these few examples:

A: While all the evidence points to America's defeat in the 12-day wars and the Ramadan war, and almost all reputable media and leading experts in the world admit to this defeat, Mr. Zarif defends the humiliating Treaty of Turkmanchai!

A treaty according to which three states of the Caucasus, i.e. Yerevan, Nakhchivan and parts of Talash, were separated from Iran and given to the Russians. Mr. Zarif says that at that time, the Russian army had advanced to the gates of Qazvin and if the Turkmenchai Treaty was not signed, Iran would have been conquered by the enemy! And then with the same analogy, surrendering to America is rational! And wisely! He assumes and does not realize that first; Today, the Islamic Republic of Iran is the winner of the war, and America must give concessions and retaliate. Secondly; How easy (and in line with Mohammad Khatami) is a shameless surrender to the enemy, an honorable peace (!) Thirdly; It doesn't explain how his humiliating proposal is different from Trump's and Netanyahu's wish on the ground?! Now judge for yourself if the American ambassador was present in Iran, wouldn't he consider Mr. Zarif's proposal dozens of times more humiliating and treasonous than America's demand?!

B: Mr. Hossein Marashi, Secretary General of the Kargazaran Party, says: "I warn the President, the Speaker of the Parliament, Mr. Rezaei, the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and the respected IRGC commanders that they have absolutely no right to take any risks in preventing a possible third war." Every political and military plan and every tactical retreat that is necessary must be done to preserve Iran. He also proposed a humiliating surrender in another way, that too at the peak of victory, with the word "peace seeking"! moves

That is, it repeats exactly the same wasted dream of Trump and Netanyahu. His advice to retreat in front of America (read surrender and the same offer to give and go) is while America, according to the authorities of that country, is fed up with Iran's epic resistance and is looking for a so-called honorable way out. Now, it should be seen that if America had an official ambassador and embassy in Iran, did it have any other wishes and desires to save America from the quagmire it is trapped in?!

A: The officially announced expectation of the United States was to end the existence of the Islamic Republic of Iran within two weeks, but it faced Iran's exemplary resistance and suffered a severe defeat. Now pay attention to the proposal of Mr. Hassan Rouhani, the former president of Iran. With a righteous look and while he has replaced "legitimate defense" with "war", he says: "In order to continue the attack, we should turn to a referendum and poll the people (!) and he does not explain which common sense and where in the world they turn to a referendum to defend against an enemy attack?!" This proposal of Mr. Rouhani is exactly the same as the demand of the United States and the Zionist regime, who are fed up with Iran's fierce and powerful defense and wish for Iran to give up its defense and surrender! With a thousand excuses and justifications, can Mr. Rouhani's proposal be considered to lead to the destruction of Iran and open service to America and the Zionist regime?!

Now we can boldly say that although America does not have an embassy in Iran, it has dozens of ambassadors (!) America has entrusted the mission of its closed embassy to a number of Westerners and losers. If this group does not play the role of American ambassadors, then what are they doing with the mentioned positions?!

4- Now take a look at Mr. Shahidman's strict advice; The advice they gave to the security and judicial centers ten days before their martyrdom:

"The security and judicial apparatuses are responsible for dealing with those who accompany, cooperate, and sympathize with the enemy - whether in action, in language, or in analysis - to deal with them in a fair manner. I am not a supporter of unnecessary strictness, but unnecessary easing will harm the country just like unnecessary strictness. So, in my opinion, the future plan of America towards the Islamic Republic is this kind of work, this is the style of work. Of course, I am sure that by the grace of God, any movement of this kind will be destroyed by the hands of the Iranian people; without hesitation Thank God, the nation is alive, awake, and ready."

(11/28/1404 among the people of East Azerbaijan).