Qalibaf "does not take the neck" / new account of the agreement with America

Ghalibaf's new statements about America's bad faith have been contradicted by his previous positions about the achievements of the agreement; From the promise of 300 billion dollars investment and the release of Iranian funds to the claim of lifting the blockade, now this question is raised, why today's narrative of the speaker of the parliament is different from what he said yesterday?

Ambassador Arjan: Ghalibaf's new statements about America's bad faith are in conflict with his previous positions about the achievements of the agreement; From the promise of 300 billion dollars investment and the release of Iranian funds to the claim of lifting the blockade, now this question is raised, why today's narrative of the speaker of the parliament is different from what he said yesterday?

In an interview on Wednesday evening (October 22), Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stated, retreating from his previous positions: "I said before signing the memorandum that the Americans do not fulfill their obligations; For this reason, we prepared the memorandum in two stages... First we fought well, then we forced America to accept it and imposed the document of defeat on the enemy.

This new claim is an attempt to cover up the calculation error of the past and to avoid accepting the reality of a failed agreement; Because the speaker's position in the early days of concluding this understanding is the opposite of his justifications today.

Be sure to read: Lukashenko's clear message to Trump about the future of Ukraine, Iran's energy facilities under the shadow of Tehran's threat/what will be the reaction?

Examining his positions in the interview dated July 9, reveals this obvious contradiction; where he spoke confidently about the implementation of commitments: "America has guaranteed the existence of resistance groups in Lebanon."

- "A part of the 300 billion dollars investment of the United States and neighboring countries will be spent on compensation and compensation."

"With the signing of the memorandum, the siege was lifted."

- "America said it would not give money for a century, but finally it had to give this 12 billion dollars... I went to Zurich, the deputy treasury of the United States and Vance came, AFEC was signed and the money became free."

- "It is unfair if they don't see the relative peace of Lebanon and emphasize the weak conflicts caused by the evil of the Zionists" (that too, only one month before the fall of Ali al-Tahir hills!).

Attempting to justify past mistakes and claiming to be aware of the enemy's breach of covenant, while in the days of the agreement, the same clauses were promoted as a document of honor, shows the continuation of a strategic error in analyzing the behavior of the Great Satan. Denying the past does not change the performance of this dreamer.