War as a Tool for Electoral Victory / Nasri: Trump and Netanyahu's Aims in Resuming War Are Purely Electoral; No Legal Argument Can Hide It

An international affairs expert, analyzing reports on the possibility of renewed military clashes before the elections in Israel and the United States, warned that the decision by leaders in Washington and Tel Aviv to return to war is driven solely by domestic political and electoral interests. In this cautionary analysis, he noted that after the aggression began, terms such as 'legitimate defense' and 'imminent threat' have suddenly replaced the underlying motive.

The senior expert on international issues, in an analysis of published reports about the possibility of restarting military conflicts before the elections in Israel and the United States, warned that the decision of the heads of Washington and Tel Aviv to return to war is made solely from the perspective of domestic political and electoral interests; A warning analysis that emphasized that after the beginning of the aggression, words like "legitimate defense" and "imminent threat" will suddenly replace electoral motivations, while Article 51 of the United Nations Charter never allows turning war into a tool for party competition and the ballot box.

According to Arjan's ambassador, Reza Nasri, a senior foreign policy expert, in a message on his user account on the X social network, emphasized the need to record and save this position in the collective memory, and wrote that all reliable reports show that Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants the United States to resume military operations against Iran before the Israeli parliamentary elections on November 5 (October 27).

According to this expert, in Washington, the case of returning to war is deeply and closely tied to the calculations of the November 12 (November 3) mid-term elections of the Congress, and there is no doubt that Netanyahu and Donald Trump, the President of the United States, evaluate the issue of war only through the lens of their political needs and party survival inside.

Nasri emphasized: "This unquestionable fact must be officially recorded today and remain in the memory of history; Because when the attacks resume, the official tone and literature will change overnight."

This jurist explained that after the beginning of aggression, the traces of electoral calculations were removed from public statements and expressions such as "imminent threat", "legitimate defense" or the claim of a new state of emergency in national security will be replaced.

He reminded that Western jurists will be assigned to give a legal and justified cover to a completely political decision that was taken before consulting them; A process in which most European governments, as usual, accept this false narrative and by issuing statements about Iran's destabilizing actions, blame the country that has been attacked.

Instrumental abuse of Article 51 of the United Nations Charter

This analyst of strategic issues stated that none of these fake scenarios can hide the real reason for adopting this warlike decision.

He noted: "Article 51 of the United Nations Charter authorizes the use of force exclusively in response to an armed attack, not as a tool in the service of propaganda campaigns and election contests; "No justification that is concocted after the incident is able to purify the decision that was the main driver of that election schedule."

At the end of his message, Nasri warned public opinion and international observers: "Remember the sequence of events; The sinister motivation of this decision is quite obvious today and before the fake excuse arrives. When this fake excuse appeared, it should be weighed against the information we have today about their true intentions."