Trump regrets the assassination?!
Today, in a thoughtful comment, Trump said that the assassination of Iranian officials was excessive and "we could have stopped at the first level, and going to the second level was probably excessive."
Today, in a thoughtful comment, Trump said that the assassination of Iranian officials was excessive and "we could have stopped at the first level, and going to the second level was probably excessive."
Ambassador Arjan - International Group: He describes the reason for this as "we are facing a big problem in order to understand who to negotiate with".
Two factors can be behind these words of the American president; First of all, it is likely that in his recent phone call with Trump, the President of Russia expressed his opinion about the assassination of the former secretary of Iran's National Security Council, and Trump may have been influenced by these words.
Putin recently called this assassination "a very big mistake" and said: "Larijani was a very positive person and was ready to reach a bilateral solution based on Iran's national interests to solve problems. This was a mistake, because such a person was needed for today to come up with solutions.
But the second factor can also be a deception tactic, and in this way Trump is trying to instill some kind of reassurance in the current authorities that he is no longer looking for assassination.
However, regardless of which one of the aforementioned two motives is involved, it is almost certain that any other kind of conflict will start again with terror.
The American president said: We will end it (the war with Iran); Of course, I can't tell you for sure.
Following the claim of some American media about Tehran's attempt to resume negotiations with Washington, Ali Larijani denied any talks with America and considered Donald Trump as the cause of chaos in the region.
The maximum pressure, military threats and diplomatic fluctuations of the United States towards Iran serve to produce a "demonstration victory" rather than to build a stable agreement. But such an approach, instead of reducing structural tensions, often leads to the deepening of mistrust and leads regional actors to alternative options.