Hossein Shariatmadari: Anyone who believes in ending the war and preserving Iran is an American ambassador

Hossein Shariatmadari attacked several political figures, calling them America's ambassadors in Iran.

According to Ambassador Arjan, Kihan newspaper wrote:

A: While all the evidence points to the defeat of America in the 12-day wars and the Ramadan war, and almost all the reputable media and leading experts in the world admit this defeat, Mr. Zarif defends the humiliating treaty of Turkmanchai! A treaty according to which three states of the Caucasus, i.e. Yerevan, Nakhchivan and parts of Talash, were separated from Iran and given to the Russians.

Mr. Zarif says that at that time, the Russian army had advanced to the gates of Qazvin and if the Turkmenchai Treaty was not signed, Iran would have been conquered by the enemy! And then with the same analogy, surrendering to America is rational! And wisely! He assumes and does not realize that first; Today, the Islamic Republic of Iran is the winner of the war, and America must give concessions and retaliate. Secondly; How easy (and in line with Mohammad Khatami) is a shameless surrender to the enemy, an honorable peace (!) Thirdly; It doesn't explain how his humiliating proposal is different from Trump's and Netanyahu's wish on the ground?! Now judge for yourself if the American ambassador was present in Iran, wouldn't he consider Mr. Zarif's proposal dozens of times more humiliating and treasonous than America's demand?!

B: Mr. Hossein Marashi, Secretary General of the Kargazaran Party, says: "I warn the President, the Speaker of the Parliament, Mr. Rezaei, the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and the respected IRGC commanders that they have absolutely no right to take any risks in preventing a possible third war." Every political and military plan and every tactical retreat that is necessary must be done to preserve Iran. He also proposed a humiliating surrender in another way, that too at the peak of victory, with the word "peace seeking"! moves That is, it repeats exactly the same wasted dream of Trump and Netanyahu. His advice to retreat in front of America (read surrender and the same offer to give and go) is while America, according to the authorities of that country, is fed up with Iran's epic resistance and is looking for a so-called honorable way out. Now, it should be seen that if America had an official ambassador and embassy in Iran, did it have any other wishes and desires to save America from the quagmire it is trapped in?!

A: The officially announced expectation of the United States was to end the existence of the Islamic Republic of Iran within two weeks, but it faced Iran's exemplary resistance and suffered a severe defeat. Now pay attention to the proposal of Mr. Hassan Rouhani, the former president of Iran. With a righteous look and while he has replaced "legitimate defense" with "war", he says: "In order to continue the attack, we should turn to a referendum and poll the people (!) and he does not explain which common sense and where in the world they turn to a referendum to defend against an enemy attack?!" This proposal of Mr. Rouhani is exactly the same as the demand of the United States and the Zionist regime, who are fed up with Iran's fierce and powerful defense and wish for Iran to give up its defense and surrender! With a thousand excuses and justifications, can Mr. Rouhani's proposal be considered to lead to the destruction of Iran and open service to America and the Zionist regime?!

Now we can boldly say that although America does not have an embassy in Iran, it has dozens of ambassadors (!) America has entrusted the mission of its closed embassy to a number of Westerners and losers. If this group does not play the role of American ambassadors, then what are they doing with the mentioned positions?!