Badamchian: When in Qom with one million people, a young man talks to seven people about the dismissal of doctors, it is the reason for freedom/ we cannot understand why they are saying these things.

The head of the Central Council of the Islamic United Party said about the night gatherings and the request for the removal of the president: "When a young man walks with seven to twenty people in Qom with a population of one million, he says, this is the reason for freedom." The fact that no one objects to him is the reason for Iran's authority. In my opinion, these should not be enlarged at all. As for me, I don't bring these talks, I don't say these things. Let's kill them because they say these things! Well, hit them

According to Ambassador Arjan Asadollah Badamchian, Chairman of the Central Council of the Islamic United Party, emphasizing that if someone acts against the country's interest, he should be tried according to the law, he said: If we say now that we will not fight, will he not fight? If he feels weak in us, he will make the worst attack. Now he is looking for the assassination of our people. For example, look at what he did in Lebanon. Israel completely razed its cities and villages to the ground, and at that time it was supported by America. Our war with them will not end with negotiation and compromise, our war will end with our authority.

According to Ambassador Arjan, you can read the details of the conversation with Asadollah Badamchian below:

It was a very good speech, everyone agreed; That is, there was no one who did not confirm. Trump says there, I will destroy Iran! What are you doing to destroy? And therefore, Mr. Al-Badzikian and Mr. Araghchi decided together and prepared his speech. It was a very good speech. On the other hand, he went there wearing a black dress and held up the picture of the martyr Imam and said, "I come from Iran, whose leader was martyred." To be honest, he spoke very calmly; Instead of using harsh words, he spoke words appropriate to the place of the speech and his audience in the world. We really thanked him in the party.

However, his speech had two parts; Someone really, as you said, negated arrogance and colonialism and spoke passionately about the fact that we will not surrender, and on the one hand, he did not stop the discussion of negotiations and said that we are looking for regional peace. What is your assessment of this issue?

Did the Islamic Republic system during the time of the Imam and the Martyr Imam block the negotiation?! During the time of the Imam, when there was a meeting and conversation and the resolution of 598, during the time of the martyred Imam, when Mr. Zarif left, they negotiated, and Iran is negotiating after that. Now, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council said very clearly that we will negotiate and defend. If they want, we will fight them and destroy their lives.

Some friends think that negotiation is compromise and that's why they say not to compromise. In fact, they are not saying not to negotiate, they are saying not to compromise. The reason is these friends who have reduced the negotiation to compromise. When some of our friends want to talk, they went to talk to the president that very week, and that day when we were there, they said the same thing, sir, this understanding was very good, it was very great, now you must use this opportunity to agree with America, build it and finish it! This causes a group here to say, sir, the meaning of negotiation is compromise, so let's not negotiate. No, I am not saying that there is no negotiation, no compromise; Compromise negotiation is betrayal, not authoritative negotiation where one speaks.

So, do you agree that those who approve of the president and like his words should accept all of the president's words, instead of rejecting a part and accepting a part? is it true

Is it mandatory to accept everything? I am free, I accept any part of the president's speech if I want to, I don't accept if I don't want to. We cannot forcefully say that if someone says this, they must accept everything; why Every person has a theory, he is free. It is important to respect the president and support the president in this era when we are now involved in "no war, no peace" and everyone feels that the president, the head of the legislature, and the head of the judiciary must be preserved, that dignity and privacy must be preserved; Is it a force to accept or not accept now?

it is true Just tonight, I saw a car in Qom with a loud speaker on its head and a young man was chanting slogans, and some people were behind him and the car saying that the solution to the problems is to dismiss the doctors! We see a lot of these kinds of words in gatherings. What advice do you have in this regard?

When a young man walks with seven to twenty people in Qom with a million people, he says, this is the reason for freedom. The fact that no one objects to him is the reason for Iran's authority. In my opinion, these should not be enlarged at all. As for me, I don't bring these talks, I don't say these things. Wow, I think; For example, what does it matter?! Bring two speakers, one on this side and one on that side.

Does it mean that no one cares about these things, they are not seen?

On the other hand, you can't suppress them, let's say, sir, let's kill them, why are they saying these things! Well, if they hit, they will see that it is useless and it will end.

Do you agree that these hard-line people who you say are limited, their hands are very open, but if the critics make a criticism, they will be dealt with, like Mr. Abdi who made a criticism and they were dealt with...

The reformist faction is in favor of compromise with America, which is clear. All of them are looking to build with America. People don't accept them anymore; They don't accept Abdi, they don't accept those people, they don't. The day Abdi climbed the wall of the American embassy, ​​the nation came and stood behind him. The day that one of them left and shook hands, people hate them. People hate that these people who shed so much blood of martyrs martyred our imam with this situation, Mr. Abdi is still looking for this. Mr. Abdi who does not say the policy of Mr. President.

Anyway, there is an idea that the movement that considers itself revolutionary is immune, but people who are critics are not immune, why is that?

Excuse me, sir, have I ever uttered a wrong word, will I be arrested? You are interviewing me, I will also interview you and Ambassador Arjan. I tell him, I speak calmly, but no one says anything. Breaking the law, destroying, I read Shargh newspaper every day; The same negativity, slander, "Iran is a crisis, it is a war, it is a so-and-so and it is a disaster", they have nothing to do; They are just using the facilities of the Ministry of Culture and Guidance! who says Then Mr. Abdi, Mr. Zeidabadi, Mr. So-and-so say these things, they invite them to meet with Mr. President at the Ministry of Interior, even though the people do not like what they say. The problem is not fundamentalists and such. This type of argument that, in the opinion of the officials of this country, the fundamentalists are exempted from whatever they say and the other group is not wrong; This is a slander against our officials. Where do our officials conduct these meetings?

Have you seen the wave of attacks on Mr. Zarif and Mr. Rouhani during this time?

They who say something every day that the nation does not accept and do not accept, do they expect to be applauded for them?

Do you consider yourself a representative of all Iranian people? Or finally a range of people?

No, we say that the majority of us, you say the majority of our brigade, does not accept this at all. When they don't like it, they have to say something to him.

They do not offend; Now, if someone offends, he has made a mistake.

Should they take him to question him? Then go to court?

For example, if someone says something against the interest of the country, during the war, water is poured into the mill of America, they should be brought to trial according to the law of the judiciary. So what to do? Everyone can do whatever they want. On the other hand, they also arrest them and take them to prison.

Because you can see that they also talk a lot against unity in the tribunes; In this war situation, it is even against the leadership and the system.

The judiciary does not stop people's speech now, but whoever comes there and says something like this, will anyone listen to him? He comes there and takes a sign saying to release Mr. so-and-so, does anyone listen to him? No! Will that man be released too? No! If he committed a crime, he should go to prison for his crime.

Now whatever, I don't want to name names.

Let's go to the current situation of Iran and America; However, many people are worried that there will be a war. How do you see the future?

That we are at war with America, Trump said in the United Nations that he wants to destroy Iran. He says that we destroyed Iran, Iran has no navy, air force, land force, and no nuclear power, and now we want to reach an agreement! This person who gets drunk, then sleeps, wakes up and talks nonsense in the world of drunkenness.

The president of a country clearly says that he wants to destroy Iran and return this nation to the Stone Age. He came, hit, bombed, martyred our leader; What should we say then? We also defended ourselves. Now we are defending; But authoritative defense, not passive defense. We stopped him and he is under pressure. Now Trump is desperate. He doesn't know what to do now.

Now, if we say now that we will not fight, will there not be a war? If he feels weak in us, he will make the worst attack. Now he is looking for the assassination of our people. For example, look at what he did in Lebanon. Israel completely razed its cities and villages to the ground, and at that time it was supported by America. Our war with them will not end with negotiation and compromise, our war will end with our authority.

Now the Yemenis have the power to attack Saudi Arabia. Now they allowed the American ship, they said you want to go, go, if you go and attack Saudi Arabia, we will beat you too; It did not and Saudi Arabia has not helped so far. So power answers, power; You think about power.

I mean, anyway, what will happen to the Israeli elections?

I don't think it is very important; Is Israel going to disappear because Netanyahu is not here? No, but it is true that Netanyahu is now hated by the world. Netanyahu went to speak at the United Nations, all countries left the meeting. That is clear. Now all Israelis are fleeing. In addition to the fact that now no one in the world, not even America, can say I am Israeli, people hate it. When Israel is hated like this, will an American who owes thirty million dollars come to spend on Israel? This Israel is finished, it will take time until we can pray in Quds, God willing.

Explain about some of the actions that are taken in the parliament, that is in these war conditions, such as the possible impeachment of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and others, what is the meaning and message of this in this situation?

Now let's see if it can be done at all or not.

Finally, the issue of these issues in these war conditions that you...

I am not going to take a stand there, whatever happens in heaven and earth!

It's not a matter of position, after all, don't you have a conclusion about this issue in the party?

When it is brought up in the parliament, our faction will comment.

Finally, you must have an opinion about the impeachment of the foreign minister in wartime.