Ageing Parliament member slams Iranian president over Nahj al-Balagha remarks: You advise Pezeshkian not to speak about Nahj al-Balagha, yet you speak about everything yourself

Member of the Assembly of Experts Ayatollah Arafi has urged the president "not to delve into interpreting the Quran and Nahj al-Balagha, as major mistakes may occur that may not be reparable."

A member of the Council of Leadership Experts (Ayatollah Araki) has asked the president not to interpret the Qur'an and Nahj al-Balagha. Because big mistakes happen that may not be recoverable."

According to Ambassador Arjan's report, Jomohri-e-Islami newspaper wrote: By the way, this is a "strategic necessity". Both the president must be committed to it, as well as the representatives of experts and others who are in the position of khutbah. Everyone should consider themselves bound to comment only in their area of ​​expertise. By the way, many of our problems come from this, that gentlemen, in specialized areas, say non-specialized things.

Of course, the physician does not comment, he quotes from Nahj al-Balagha and sometimes adds a verse to his words. But some gentlemen, although they themselves are in all matters, it can be said and written that they comment on "all matters", but they react if the other approaches the field in which they consider themselves to be experts. Of course, it is good for a person to be zealous about his expertise and to differentiate between general opinion and speech and specialized opinion and speech, but he must constantly remind himself that he should not give an "expert opinion" except in the field in which he has acquired knowledge and experience.

If this view becomes our standard behavior, most of the problems will be solved. Especially in foreign policy and global outlook, where sometimes everything is affected by a non-specialist word. In the situation of neither war nor peace, which is both peace and war at the same time, one must carefully choose the words to produce exactly the same meaning that conveys the intended purpose. It is a fact that we need expertise in all matters, especially in the field of governance and more specifically in the public and social sphere of governance. To literature that is constructive and hopeful. At least if it does not add hope, it will not lead to the development of jasmine. Let's say it correctly and precisely so that the society can accurately align itself with the facts. It is much better to give place to non-specialist talking due to its complications!

Why is this member of the Majlis of Experts upset about Nahj al-Balagheh reading by doctors?/ If the president...