A Critique of the "Big Advantage, Survival" Theory

One of the current ideas regarding the state of war and negotiations is to give a big concession to the American side to give up on Iran. This idea believes that the country is in a situation where even if it is necessary, something like Turkmenchai should be accepted in order to get rid of the pressure of the enemy and ensure the survival of the country. The problems of this view should be examined on several levels.

First of all, the historical explanation of the Turkmencha story is not complete and accurate, and by the way, Rahzan has also been left out in this representation. That is, history is represented in a way that the desired result of the speaker is taken from it, and not as it really was. Secondly, today's world is depicted in a way that is inconsistent with the outside world. A world in which there is still a superpower, there is an upward civilizational thought, and we Iranians are the completely weak side of it. Now, the mentioned world is the world of the 1990s and it has changed for many years. Therefore, the reality of the past is not defined and interpreted correctly, and the reality of today is not seen correctly.

But more important than these two issues, is the question of what exactly is the other side looking for to get rid of us and not have anything to do with our survival? This is where the superficiality of the thought becomes clear. This thinking that the issue is a nuclear issue and by giving a big concession in this regard, the enemy will give up on Iran and leave. However, Iran's "Venezuelanization" is a big advantage from the enemy's point of view. They want to hear a yes eye from Iran so that the next yes eyes will follow it; There will be no stopping their demands. The issue is selling the country. This is just America; Above all, the Zionist regime looks at the issue with a different lens. The regime sees Iran's geopolitics as its enemy and seeks to divide Iran. Even if America leaves, our story and the regime will remain. Unless the same great privilege is given to America to abandon the Iranian regime; Because Iran has become a satellite of America in that impossible assumption.

So what should be done? From our point of view, it is impossible to satisfy them by giving big concessions to America. Because the concession that the enemy wants is to sell the country and colonize Iran. By increasing the power and hitting the economic interests of the enemy and fighting well in the necessary time, the enemy should be pushed back and forced to make concessions like the Islamabad Memorandum. These points also have a tactical aspect until the enemy is unable to continue the war. In fact, you should fight and turn the results of the war into political points in order to continue and buy time. Neither a big score nor a war without a vision can bring us to the point of deterrence. But fighting, increasing tension at the right time and finally getting political points at the right moment, can bring the enemy to the point of inability to continue the war (especially considering its domestic economy). That is where deterrence will come to life.