Factory vs. Market Price Gap for Kuick / Buy This Model and Earn 895 Million Toman + Table, Mehr 1405

Read the factory and market price gap for Kuick in this report.

Department of Economics; Examining the trading process in the car market indicates that the Quick family products continue to witness a wide price difference between the factory price and the trading prices in the open market; Meanwhile, the Quick GXR model has provided the most profitable opportunity for buyers by recording the largest price gap.

Based on this, the factory price of Quick GXR is set at 825 million tomans, but this car is bought and sold for 1.720 million tomans in the open market. Based on this, the buyer of this model, by delivering it from the factory and selling it in the market, will get a profit equal to 895 million tomans, which is a very impressive profit margin compared to the base price.

The factory price of Quick RS is 1 billion 12 million tomans, but its price in the open market has reached 1 billion 640 million tomans. By buying from the factory and selling in the market, the buyer of this car will make a profit of around 528 million tomans.

Also, the factory price of Quick S is 1 billion 32 million tomans and its price in the open market reaches 1 billion 625 million tomans. In this model, the price gap means a profit of 593 million tomans for the buyer.

Finally, Quick GX is sold at a price of 1.63 billion tomans in the factory, with a price difference compared to other models, while it is traded in the market at a price of 1.647 million tomans. This car, with a price difference of 584 million tomans, brings a good profit for the applicants.

Quick vs Saina / Which car is the better choice?

In Iran's economic car market, the competition between Quick and Saina has always been of interest from the point of view of buyers; If we examine these two cars from a technical point of view, it is clear that the Quick has a relative advantage over the Saina by using a newer platform and improved safety standards. In designing the body and using some more modern parts, Quick has been able to provide a more stable driving experience than the older generations, although the Saina has not lost its popularity among loyal customers due to its classic design and ease of maintenance.

From the point of view of technical and engine performance, both cars use economical and high-consumption engines, but in its new models, Quick has tried to cover the weaknesses of the past by improving the power transmission system and revising the suspension system. However, compared to Saina, Quick in some versions with more suitable engine volume and torque, responds better to city needs; However, in long journeys, due to their economic structure, both cars depend on the correct choice of fuel type and compliance with the engine speed in order to avoid side costs.

Looking at the market and the purchase value makes the competition extremely sensitive; While Quick includes more profit margin and price difference from the factory to the market due to its newer technology, Saina is still considered a safe option for buyers due to its lower depreciation and the possibility of extensive repairs in all parts of Iran. All in all, if the buyer's priority is "modernity and technology", the Quick is the winner, and if the focus is on "simplicity and long-term maintenance costs", the Saina is still a serious competitor in the economy car market.