Criticism of Ayatollah Araki: Pezeshkian Advised Not to Speak About Nahj al-Balagha

A member of the Assembly of Experts for Leadership, Ayatollah Araki, has urged the president to "refrain from interpreting the Quran and Nahj al-Balagha, as major mistakes may occur that are not necessarily reparable."

Every speech should not be called "political". Reading with these glasses makes sense somewhere. Based on this, I believe that one of the members of the Council of Leadership Experts asked the president not to interpret the Qur'an and the Nahj al-Balagha. Because big mistakes happen, which may not be recoverable." I don't know politics. By the way, this is a "strategic necessity". Both the president must be committed to it, as well as the representatives of experts and others who are in the position of khutbah.

Everyone should consider themselves bound to comment only in their area of expertise. By the way, many of our problems come from this, that gentlemen, in specialized areas, say non-specialized things. It is not enough that they want experts to turn a blind eye to their learnings and experiences and express this non-specialist view as the principle of expertise and organize things that way. Of course, as far as I have heard, the president of the medical profession does not comment that he is quoting from Nahj al-Balagha and sometimes adds a verse to his words. But some gentlemen, although they themselves are in all matters, it can be said and written that they comment on "all matters", but they react if the other approaches the field in which they consider themselves to be experts.

Of course, it is good for a person to be zealous about his expertise and to differentiate between general opinion and speech and specialized opinion and speech, but he must constantly remind himself that he should not give an "expert opinion" except in the field in which he has acquired knowledge and experience. I think that if this view becomes our standard behavior, most of the problems will be solved. Especially in foreign policy and global outlook, where sometimes everything is affected by a non-specialist word. In the situation of neither war nor peace, which is both peace and war at the same time, one must carefully choose the words to produce exactly the same meaning that conveys the intended purpose.

It is a fact that we need expertise in all matters, especially in the field of governance and more specifically in the public and social sphere of governance. To literature that is constructive and hopeful. At least if it does not add hope, it will not lead to the development of jasmine. Let's say it correctly and precisely so that the society can accurately align itself with the facts. It is much better to give way to silence, considering the complications of non-specialist talking!

Mr. Araki, how come you have the right to interpret the Qur'an and Nahj al-Balaghah according to your opinion, but the president, who according to the constitution must be a political figure, does not have the right to read the Qur'an and Nahj al-Balaghah.

If Nahj al-Balaghah is followed, he must root out the oppressor, kill the embezzler, destroy the rentier, pull the wealth out of their throats, eat the halal property and the halal morsel, and...

To be honest and precise, go, Dad, your heart is full, no one else will say hurtful words to a single goose.