The reasons for the impeachment of Araghchi according to the four representatives who signed the plan/member of the parliament: In war conditions, there is also a field court

Four MPs who signed Araghchi's impeachment motion have been interviewed. They had different opinions, but they all emphasized that the Minister of Foreign Affairs should answer the questions of the delegates.

In recent days, Mahmoud Naboyan, the representative of Tehran's extremists in the parliament, has published the names of the signatories of the impeachment motion of Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in cyberspace. The number of these representatives is 35 according to what Nabeyan published and until its publication.

Meanwhile, critics believe that the impeachment of the foreign minister is not advisable in the current situation of the country and can cause problems in the diplomatic process.

In this regard, we have talked with four people who signed the impeachment motion against Abbas Araghchi.

Read the statements of these four MPs below:

Abbas Begdeli, representative of the vineyard in the Islamic Shura Majlis

Mohammad Motamedizadeh, the representative of Sirjan in the Islamic Council

Mohammad Taghi Naqd Ali, the representative of Khomeinishahr in the Islamic Council

Ahmad Aryaninejad, representative of Malair in the Islamic Council

The first issue was meeting with American officials; Because we did not see any clarification about the permission for this visit and apparently no permission was issued, but they held a meeting there.

According to the statements made by Mohsen Rezaei, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's message was supposed to be conveyed to the other side through intermediaries, but Mr. Araghchi met directly with American officials in New York. This meeting was conducted without the permission of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution and outside of the necessary coordination. The calculation error regarding the statements and assessments of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was misleading and sometimes these assessments also played a role in security and military surprises.

The main issue is about Abbas Araghchi's meeting with Wittkauf and the margins created around this meeting. One of the main reasons for my sensitivity to this issue is the same meeting and approach that can be seen in some of Mr. Araghchi's statements. This issue and the weak points that are taken from his speeches have made me use my monitoring tools as a member of parliament.

According to the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's conditions were supposed to be transferred to the American side through intermediaries, and there was no reason for negotiations to take place. However, he violated that framework and a meeting was held that could have a negative impact on the oil market and the global economy; This means that it will be positive for the other party and negative for us, and it will reduce the price of oil

"Almost at all times when the oil market is on the path of price increase, we see Mr. Araghchi's tweets, interviews and comments. Today, what challenges the western side is the economic and energy market. With the publication of a tweet by Araghchi, we immediately see a drop in oil prices. The price of oil, which could reach 200 to 250 dollars, is now constantly fluctuating in the range of 100 dollars and a little higher.

He negotiates with the enemy without coordinating with the elements of the system. We have questions in this regard and expect an explanation

Some say that now is not the time for impeachment, but it should be noted that although we are in a war situation, there is also a field court in this situation.

In my opinion, anyone who tries to save the country from war through dialogue and negotiation should receive a medal of honor. No sane person wants war for his country. These representatives have no place among us nation