Warning to Pezeshkian about Iran; dangerous prescriptions are being written... | What is happening in Washington's cognitive war room? The battlefield equation has changed

"At a time when the United States is on the eve of midterm elections and Donald Trump, fearing a heavy defeat in the polls, keeps resorting to falsehoods about the "opening of the Strait of Hormuz" to create an imaginary image of victory, a "crooked current" has also gotten to work inside the country."

"In the days when the United States is on the verge of mid-term elections and Donald Trump, fearing a heavy defeat in the polls, keeps resorting to lies about the opening of the Strait of Hormuz in order to create an imaginary image of victory, inside the country, an "angled current" has also been started."

According to Ambassador Arjan's report, Kayhan wrote: In the days when Washington is wading in the self-made swamp of war, the "angular current" inside is trying to save Trump by justifying Turkmanchai, giving a warning to security and military officials about entering another war and purifying infiltrators; A serious danger that requires the president's decisive action and the adoption of a war formation.

In the days when the United States is on the verge of the mid-term elections and Donald Trump, fearing a heavy defeat in the polls, keeps resorting to lies about the "opening of the Strait of Hormuz" in order to create an imaginary image of victory, inside the country there is also an "angled flow". By updating the failed theory of surrender, this infiltrating and westernized trend is trying to make the officials' computing device suffer a gross error; One by justifying Turkmanchai's scandalous letter, the other by drawing a line for military authorities and warning about the risk of war, and the third by reopening the nuclear confusion coil!

But the main question is: Has Islamic Iran reached a dead end or is it Trump and his psychological operations team who are wading in the swamp of war?

These days, Trump's vocabulary is more limited than ever and he repeats statements almost several times a day: firstly, "Hormuz is open", secondly, "the war with Iran will end soon; Either by agreement or by war! And thirdly, "I don't care about elections, and if there are elections, the Republicans will win"!

But the reality says something else. About two weeks ago, "Basnet" claimed that Iran's economy will collapse completely in 14 days. To achieve this, they launched a more intense siege and heavy psychological operations against air and shipping lines. Now those 14 days are over; It is true that the economic situation of the country is not ideal, but not only the collapse did not happen, but the enemy's calculations turned out to be wrong again. What worked in the meantime was neither the siege nor the failed airport project, but the cognitive disruption caused by the psychological operation.

The battle between Iran and America has four main pillars: military, economic-resilience, diplomatic and cognitive-psychological.

Undoubtedly, the main pillar in the current situation is the cognitive dimension that the Trump administration has opened a special account on; If Washington takes a real action unit, at least 10 units will mediate on its psychological effect, and in the meantime, the triangle of Trump, Bessant and Mark Rubio has three specific goals on their agenda.

The first goal is to influence American public opinion; Public opinion is scarred by the warmonger who, according to polls, plans to show his dissatisfaction with Trump at the ballot box. The second goal is to disrupt the calculations of Iranian officials, so that by targeting Tehran's decision-making room, the country's officials will make a calculation error in the dialectic of war and negotiation and give Trump points by issuing compromise positions. And finally, the ultimate goal is to break the resilience of the Iranian society in order to distort the image of victory in the public mind by pumping despair and provide the necessary platform for the next advances of the enemy.

Meanwhile, Iran's precise strikes on defense, infrastructure, and the hiding place of American officers in safe houses, along with the complete control over the Strait of Hormuz, have changed the equation. To the extent that Major General Mohsen Rezaei, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, openly warned: "If America attacks Iran again, its assets such as key data systems and artificial intelligence sensors will be targeted."

Even Mark Rubio, the US Secretary of State, when he saw that he was not doing anything on the battlefield, resorted to historical fantasies and ancient battles between Iran and Greece, and tried to make today's confrontation look like an "eternal civilizational conflict" in order to justify Washington's contemporary failures! The American magazine Foreign Affairs also acknowledged in an analysis: "What should America do with Iran and the Middle East?... In August, Michael Fuchs argued in Foreign Affairs magazine that the conflict - which he described as a "colossal disaster" - should be the trigger for a long-overdue exit. According to him, the United States should withdraw all its bases and forces from the region and "end its role as the guarantor of regional order" so that Washington can focus on more important goals in Asia and Europe.

The explicit warning of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution and the unforgettable will of Mr. Shahid against the line of the enemy, the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, Hazrat Imam Seyed Mojtaba Khamenei, with firmness and determination, drew a line of invalidity against illusory dichotomies and said:

"Undoubtedly, any disappointing and weakening words of national and public motivations and any kind of illusory dichotomy such as war or negotiation, agreement or extremism, compromise or warmongering, which caused direct or indirect damage to our beloved people in the past, can leave the same effect from now on. Therefore, I firmly declare that it is forbidden to commit anything that harms social cohesion.

The honorable president should remember that the warning about this angular current is not a new advice. Mr. Shahidman, just a few days before the last presidential election (July 5, 1403), addressed the candidates and said:

"Our advice to the election candidates is this; I ask these honorable gentlemen to make a promise to God that if you are successful and manage to gain responsibility, you will not appoint your people and agents from those who have an angle with the revolution. The one who has an angle with the revolution, with Imam Rahel, with the Islamic system, he is not of any use to you. He will not be a good colleague for you. "The person who is attached to America and thinks that without America's favor it is not possible to move forward step by step in the country, he will not be a good colleague for you."

Unfortunately, the neglect of these advices has caused the Western trends, whose computing system has been captured by the enemy, to re-enter some posts and positions and reproduce the same old formulas of "we can't", "let us go" and "end the war". Let's not forget that before the January 1404 coup, these same wrong addresses and unwise decisions of people like these in removing the preferred currency provided the surfing platform for the enemy and his mercenaries.

The unveiling of new versions of Taslim

Today, the anglers have removed their masks from their faces. The recent statements of some figures of this flow are clearly drawing a line against the enemy and playing on Washington's ground:

Mohammad Javad Zarif, the former foreign minister, in a thoughtful position to justify the compromise, reproduces Turkmanchai's scandal like this: "When the existence of the country is in danger, you seek survival. Why were the agreements of Golestan and Turkmanchai signed? Because the enemy had come to the back of Qazvin and was trying to capture Tehran, and the existence of the country was in danger. In such a situation, an agreement is made to maintain survival."

Hossein Marashi, Secretary General of the Party of Agents, went a step further and officially drew a line for high-ranking security and military officials: "I warn the President, the Speaker of the Parliament, Mr. Rezaei, the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and the respected IRGC commanders that they have absolutely no right to take any risks in preventing a possible third war." Every political and military strategy and every tactical retreat that is necessary must be done to preserve Iran..."

In a conversation with Etemad newspaper, Behzad Naboyan, by erasing the main issue, wraps the version of bypassing the country's capabilities: "The main issue for us and the international parties... has always been the nuclear conflict... Instead of getting stuck in the details of the previous memorandum, we should return the path of dialogue directly towards the resolution of the nuclear case, because its fruition is much more strategic and vital for the removal of sanctions."

These statements are nothing but fighting with an enemy who has drawn his sword! Interestingly, Ma'ariu and the Zionist media have claimed that America asked Israel to attack Iran independently so that the political cost of it does not fall on Trump before the elections. Before the 40-day war, Washington had launched the same game of "doubt and diplomacy". In such a critical war situation, giving an ultimatum to the commanders and justifying Turkmanchai officially completes the enemy's "pre-attack deception" scenario.

The celebrities who sold the country are not the concern of the people

Simultaneously with the political alignment of the anglers, the other side of this sinister project has been keyed into the cultural arena. In a situation where the country is in a state of war and the people of Iran's envoy are more than

226 nights in the square and they warn the authorities about their livelihood and table in various ways, the media maneuver for the return of some patriot celebrities and fired professors has no proportion with the needs and concerns of the society.

After successive failures in military confrontation, biological sedition and street riots, the enemy front has focused its strategy on "quiet cultural penetration". The change of face overnight and the gestures of "false patriotism" by the elements who embraced the nation and fled to the West are part of a calculated project to step by step infiltrate cultural institutions and communicate with decision-making authorities. They are the infantry of the reconstruction of the enemy's influence network, and the cultural and social environment of the country should not be allowed to become a victim of this kind of desire.

Combat makeup against deception

Mr. Doctors! Today, the Iranian nation is standing against the world's military giants and by regionalizing the war, delivering devastating blows to the enemy's defense and infrastructure network and completely dominating the Strait of Hormuz, it has tasted the sweet taste of victory and power. Inside the country, no one feels defeated, except for the stream of surrender and anglers.

The enemy is ready to fight, but he wants to achieve the principle of surprise with the deception of negotiations. The justification of Turkmanchai, the auction wood of the nuclear project, the purification of influential celebrities and the creation of fear of war are the updated versions of the theory of surrender. Respected government should fully follow the measures of the supreme leader of the revolution and put the recommendations of Mr. Shahid as the target, shorten the hands of anglers from the decision-making rooms and instead of trusting in the mirage of negotiations, adopt a full combat and offensive formation against the enemy's combined war.