The confrontation between reformists and transitionists according to Mohsen Armin

Mohsen Armin believes that Iran's civil movements have been drawn towards demands and goals by the transition movement, and the fulfillment of those goals was basically beyond the power and capacity of Iran's civil protests.

Ambassador Arjan; Mohammad Irfan Khani-Mohsen Armin*, the vice president of Iran's reform front, in his recent interview with Didar News media, from the position of defending the policy of reformism, critically reviewed the record of the reformists and narrated the process of canceling and revoking the reformist policy in Iran.

In this conversation, Mohsen Armin considered the project of political transition to be pointless and even destructive and emphasized that today we can make a clear judgment about the historical conflict between reformists and transitionists.

Because today the transitionists and reformists have put their goods on display in the political arena of Iran, and today a clear track record of these two currents has come before the public opinion of the country, which has made the final judgment easy for the people.

According to Mohsen Armin, on the one hand, the Iranian society is facing a current that has brought nothing but the aggravation of the crisis, and in its latest masterpiece, it has combined the transition with violence and created the disaster of January.

Armin believes that by imposing transitional and violent goals on Iran's civil movements, including the Women's Life Movement and the January Movement, and by violating the civil authenticity of Iran's street protests, it has prevented these movements from achieving their civil and reformist goals and has prevented them from solving society and governance issues.

According to Armin, on the other hand, Iranian society is facing a trend that has left an impressive and positive background and track record in some parts of Iran's political history, including the reform period; A positive track record that can be mentioned as a special component and distinguishing feature of the reformists compared to the successive failures of the reformists.

In terms of presenting the final result, the author believes that: regardless of what movement is represented by reformism in Iran's current situation and who are known as reformists, the principle of reformist and reformist policies and any reformist political line that is defined against transitional and liquidation policy, whether it is associated with a structuralist framework or a conservative framework, considering the achievement of political literalism during an experience 47 Saleh is the only political paradigm that opens the way in Iran.

ــــــــــــــــ

* Mohsen Armin (1333 in Kashan) is an Iranian reformist politician and religious researcher. He is one of the founding members, a member of the Central Council, and also the spokesman of the Mojahedin Organization of the Islamic Revolution of Iran. He was previously a representative of Tehran in the sixth term of the Islamic Council.