Widespread Criticism of Abdolhamid: Why Aren't Terrorists Condemned?

Social media users argue that Abdolhamid's continued ambiguous silence on terrorism can only help normalize violence in the region.

According to the users of cyberspace, the continuation of Abdul Hamid's ambiguous silence against terrorism can only help to normalize violence in this region.

According to the report of Ambassador Arjan, after the execution of several limited and surprising operations by the terrorist groups of the southeast, Abdul Hamid still did not have a clear reaction in condemning these actions!

These measures have been implemented by the order of the Zionist regime and with the aim of making this region insecure, and naturally, a decisive condemnation is the least action taken by the prominent figures of this region. His recent message of condolence for Martyr Eftekhari, without condemning the perpetrators of the assassination, has increased the criticism towards the behavior of this Friday imam of Makki Zahedan Mosque.

According to cyberspace users, the continuation of this ambiguous silence against terrorism can only help to normalize violence in this region. A social media activist wrote in this regard: "If Abdul Hamid is really concerned about the security and peace of the people of this region, why doesn't he take a clear and decisive position?! "People's security requires an unconventional stance."

Heavy and successful blows were inflicted by the security guards on these terrorist groups and several important elements were arrested and some were killed.