Principlist Media to IRIB: Is the Slogan of a Few Limited the Voice of All?

IRIB should know: if its emphasis on unity and avoiding insults toward officials is serious, why does its statement draw no line between protest and divisive slogans? Isn't the media supposed to not only hear the voice of the people but also question the content of slogans and their consequences? That the people have preserved the country does not mean every statement made in their name is correct.

Radio and Television should know that if the emphasis on unity and avoiding the destruction of officials is serious, why is there no boundary drawn between protest and divisive slogans in your words? In addition to listening to people's voices, isn't the media supposed to ask about the content of slogans and their consequences? The fact that the people have preserved the country does not mean that every word that is said in the name of the people is true.