The Claim That Tehran Has Lost Its Leverage in the Strait Is Incorrect / Message Exchange Through Mediators Continues / Washington Raises Alleged Nuclear Weapons Risk, Which We Are Reviewing / We Are Deeply Concerned About Developments in the Ansarallah-Saudi War / Technically and Strictly Speaking, Pakistan and Qatar Still Play the Mediating Role

Foreign Ministry spokesperson rejected the US president's claim that the Strait of Hormuz has returned to normal, stressing that these claims do not match field realities and that security will not return to this waterway as long as America continues its naval blockade and economic war.

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected the US President's claim about the return of the Strait of Hormuz to normal status, and emphasized that these claims do not match the realities on the ground and as long as the US continues the naval blockade and economic war, security will not return to this waterway.

According to the report, "Ismail Baqaei", the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, at the beginning of the press conference on Monday, October 20, while condoling the martyrdom of the cultural deputy of the police force of Sistan and Baluchistan province, said: He was one of the native forces of the region who were martyred during the terrorist attack. He had a doctorate in IT and was one of the honors of Iranian women. The reason that I mention the martyrs in the meetings is to honor the security and authority of Iran, which is the result of the sacrifices of the martyrs.

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs further added: The reason why we bless and decorate our meetings with the names and images of martyrs in the weekly meetings is to remember that every moment we are present here and benefit from the blessing of security, there are those who defend the security and authority of Iran with their lives, the sweetest asset that God has given to mankind. We send greetings to the souls of all the martyrs of Iran and the land of Iran.

Hafez's poetry is a part of our Iranian-Islamic culture and civilization

Baghai continued: Today is also Hafez's commemoration day. For us Iranians, Hafez has a different position, along with other writers and poets; Because it is a part of our Iranian-Islamic culture and civilization. I congratulate all Iranians and lovers of Iranian culture, politeness and decency on this day. If you agree, we can open Divan Hafez. I read the first two verses: whoever keeps the side of God's people/may God protect him from calamity in all situations/do not tell the hadith of a friend except to Hazrat Dost/who is familiar with the word.

The markets do not pay attention to the American claims about the Strait of Hormuz

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to the question that "the President of the United States constantly claims in his various statements that the Strait of Hormuz has returned to the normal process of energy transfer. Various analyzes of the transfer of oil from different countries from the north and south of the Strait of Hormuz have been published, and it is claimed that Iran has lost its leverage in this region. He said: "That one asked Ashtar, where do you come from, you auspicious one?" / He said from your hot bath/ He said that it is from your knee" American claims do not match what we see in the field of reality. They can still claim that the Strait of Hormuz is no longer effective and that Iran has lost its leverage, but we are doing our job.

Baqaei noted: I don't think the markets will pay much attention to such claims; The market has its own rules and regulations. The international developments and the appeal of other countries to provide the fuel they need are also well indicative of the reality. However, I must clarify that the developments in the Strait of Hormuz did not take place with the aim of leveraging. What we have witnessed in this waterway since March 9th was the direct result of the actions of the US and the Zionist regime in attacking Iran. This waterway, which Iran has the longest coastline in its vicinity, has been misused to attack our country. In such circumstances, we have adopted a series of measures based on the provisions and standards of international law.

He added: As long as America insists on making this waterway and the region insecure through naval blockade and economic war - actions that it is proud of and all of which are examples of military aggression against a country - security will not return to this waterway. We are not happy about this situation; Because the security of the Strait of Hormuz is most important for us. But America's aggressive actions have caused trouble for the region, for this country itself, for the region, and for the world. This fact should be continuously exposed to the eyes of the world in order to determine which side is the real cause and founder of the existing situation.

Rubio's narrative of history is part of the cognitive war against Iran

In response to a question about the recent statements of the US Secretary of State in Athens and his reference to the history of Greece and Western civilization and the interpretation of the wars between Iran and Greece in ancient times, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: This speech and the choice of this arrangement by the US Secretary of State should be considered part of America's cognitive war against Iran and, in a way, against the world. Presenting a completely crooked and upside down interpretation of historical events to justify America's belligerence is both dangerous and an insult to Greek culture and civilization.

He continued: Of course, the US foreign minister admitted some facts unintentionally; Including the fact that Iran has continued for thousands of years not as a piece of land or just a geography, but as a character, a concept and an idea. The continuity of a civilization and culture cannot be the result of geographical and military conquests. The secret of Iran's permanence and continuity is nothing but its interactivity. If you look at Pasargad, you will see the signs of all the cultures and civilizations that were known as rivals of Iran at that time.

The clash between Iranian civilization and the West is to legitimize war and aggression

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated in response to the claims of the US Foreign Minister: Iranians have always been competitive, but they have combined competition with interaction. We have never sought our authority and life in the negation of others and we have even interacted with our competitors. The West would not exist today in terms of meaning and thought, if Iranian and Muslim thinkers were not translators and interpreters of Greek ideas in the dark ages of the Middle Ages.

He continued: Basically, what is the relationship between America and Greece today? Greek was not only about war and warfare, but also had philosophy and culture at the same time. Iranian civilization has always been established and continued by connecting and building. Hafez is also one of Iran's civilizational honors. From here, I request Mr. Rubio's advisors to present him a volume of Hafez's Divan, which is also translated into Cuban Spanish, so that he can get acquainted with the delicacy of Iranian civilization and culture. We hope that after that, we will not see such words repeated by him.

Baqa'i pointed out that in the period when the world is facing American militancy, talking about ideological and civilizational dichotomies is a pure mistake, adding: if you want to express ideas based on the clash of civilizations in a different way, and if at that time there was talk of the clash of Islamic and Western civilizations, today you replace it with the clash of Iranian and Western civilizations, there is definitely no good intention in it, except to legitimize war and aggression. America cannot present itself as a representative of Western and Greek civilization. I will end my answer with this question: Were the two world wars that took place between Europeans and engulfed the world in its mouth, caused by the fight and confrontation between the civilization of the East and the West? Was colonialism the result of the conflict between East and West? Were the crimes that we have faced in these three years the result of the confrontation between Iran and America?

Iran's cultural week in Russia was one of the most magnificent cultural events in recent years

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs answered the question that "Iran's cultural week in Russia has ended. Considering the recent developments in the relations between Tehran and Moscow, what role can this cultural event play in strengthening the interactions between the two countries?" He said: Cultural cooperation between Iran and Russia, on the one hand, is a sign of the depth and extent of the good relations between the two countries, and on the other hand, it can be the basis for strengthening relations in various fields, including political, economic and commercial.

Baqaei, pointing out that Iran's cultural week in Russia was one of the most magnificent cultural events in recent years, which was held in four cities of this country, including Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Kazan and Astrakhan. Previously, the Russian Cultural Week was held in Iran, he noted: I feel it necessary to thank the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, the Organization of Islamic Culture and Communications and my colleagues who, with proper planning, were able to introduce some of Iran's cultural capacities and assets to the Russian audience. I also appreciate the Russian hosts for providing the necessary facilities to hold these events.

We are ready to help solve the crisis in Yemen through dialogue/ The escalation of tension in the region is only for the benefit of the Zionist regime.

In response to a question about the telephone conversation between the foreign ministers of Iran and Saudi Arabia last night in the midst of developments in Yemen and reports published about the position of the Saudi Crown Prince regarding maintaining diplomatic relations with Iran and increasing economic pressure on our country, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: It is natural for the media to have their own analyzes and claims, but regarding the talks that took place last night, I must say that the consultations between Iran and the countries of the region are ongoing.

Baqa'i pointed out that we are very worried about the events that are happening in the Arabian Peninsula, and noted: We have repeatedly declared our readiness to use Jamila's efforts to help dialogue between the parties. We believe that the continuation and escalation of tension will only lead to the exploitation of the Zionist regime in the region. In this sense, we do not like the continuation of fire and war between two Islamic countries. Our region is under enough tension due to the actions of America and the Zionist regime.

He continued: At the same time, we have always expressed our position that Yemeni people have the right to live an honorable life away from pressure, sanctions and blockade. What we have witnessed in these 10 to 12 years is not justified in terms of Islam, nor in terms of international law. Anyway, in last night's conversation, we also announced our readiness to help resolve the issue through dialogue.

We have supported the implementation of the agreement between the Yemenis and Saudi Arabia

In response to a question about the recent developments in Yemen, the release of pictures related to the incidents in this country, and the legal and international responsibility of the perpetrators, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Our position is clear. The issue of Yemen should have been resolved a long time ago through an agreement between the Yemenis and Saudi Arabia. As you know, the road map between Yemen and Saudi Arabia was agreed upon and we also emphasized that we support the implementation of whatever the parties have agreed upon. But this did not happen.

He said: If you remember, on the 22nd of July this year, there was an attack on Sana'a airport, and at the same time, we expressed our deep concern that this incident may lead to the escalation of the situation. Unfortunately, we are witnessing such a situation now. Our request is that this situation is really resolved through dialogue and interaction.

America turning to Russia for oil supply is significant

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in response to the question, "What is the position of the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding Mr. Putin's declaration of readiness to supply oil and oil products needed by the world markets, especially the American market?" He said: Every country can make decisions in line with its interests. It is natural that the Islamic Republic of Iran also decides on various issues based on its priorities and national interests. From this point of view, the issue of providing oil and oil products is an issue between Russia and America.

He added: However, regardless of the bilateral relations of these two countries, this issue is significant. If there was no problem and the problem was solved, why should the American side reach out to Russia to solve part of its problems?

Pakistan and Qatar are still mediators between Iran and America/We welcome the good efforts of Russia and other friendly countries

In response to a question about the consultations between the presidents of Iran and Russia in Turkmenistan, Vladimir Putin's next phone call with Donald Trump, and the possibility of Moscow mediating between Tehran and Washington, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Our consultations with Russia on various issues, including the nuclear issue, are not new. Russia played a very positive and effective role during the 2015 nuclear agreement and still maintains its interest in resolving this issue.

He continued: The president of our country stated our positions and once again explained Iran's seven-day plan and also explained the considerations and points about the whole issue. Considering that the Russian president was supposed to have a phone conversation with his American counterpart, this conversation was done before; But in fact, it was an expression of positions.

Baqaei emphasized: We have always welcomed the efforts of friendly countries, but as you know, technically and in the strict sense of the word, Pakistan and Qatar still play the role of mediators between Iran and the United States.

America's response to Iran's plan is still under review

In response to a question about the recent statements of Seyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, regarding the review of America's point of view on Iran's seven-point plan and Mohsen Rezaei's statements about the inadequacy of America's response and whether Iran conveyed its opinion through mediators after receiving Washington's response, the spokesperson said: The exchange of messages between Iran and the United States through mediators is still ongoing. What was raised on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly and was referred to as "Iran's seven-day plan", was actually a demand for Iran's legitimate rights. This issue has also been discussed in detail. Lifting the naval blockade, stopping the war on all fronts, and freeing Iran's assets are among the issues raised in this context. In short, these are the issues that we had reached an understanding about in the form of a memorandum of understanding.

He continued: These are Iran's rights that will be raised in any negotiation. The conditions have not changed for us to be flexible about our rights. In addition, the United States has imposed new sanctions during this period, all of which should be removed.

Baqaei pointed out: the American side has also raised its demands before. Their claim is that their main concern is still Iran's nuclear issue. Regardless of the great contradiction that exists in this position, because the Americans have announced several times that they have destroyed the entire nuclear program of Iran, they continue to raise the alleged issue of the imaginary danger of Iran's nuclear weapons and have expressed their considerations in this regard.

He said: Regarding the issue that America's response was insufficient and Iran has also announced its positions, the point raised is correct. Our position on the necessity of prioritizing the main issues in the current situation and ending America's interventionist and aggressive actions is not a new position. We have announced this issue before and the American side has been informed about our positions through mediators. However, we are investigating the points raised by the American side and will reflect our views to the mediators as soon as these investigations are completed.

The claim of handing over Iran's territory to Afghanistan has no basis

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in response to the question that "recently, one of the representatives of the parliament raised news about the transfer of 110 hectares of land to Afghanistan. Considering the existing challenges between Iran and Afghanistan, especially in the field of water, has the Ministry of Foreign Affairs been involved in consultations regarding this issue? What is the position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding this plan?" He said: They explained themselves. This issue was actually a clear misunderstanding that was taken from the statements of one of the respected representatives of the parliament. It is quite clear that the transfer of soil and land is not possible in any way. What has been mentioned is a common procedure in different countries of the world, which Iran has used and can use in the future. Based on this procedure, landlocked countries that do not have access to open waters are offered facilities in the form of lease to help develop trade between countries, within the framework of good neighborliness, and provide them with access to ports and open waters for commercial exchanges.