Ghalibaf's advisor: a new conflict is ahead / Iran's response this time will be completely surprising and different / Iran's will to fire will be definite and historic

In a detailed audio report, Mehdi Mohammadi, advisor to the President of the Islamic Council, evaluated the latest intelligence estimates, the intensification of ambiguities in the decision-making rooms of Washington and Tel Aviv, the behind-the-scenes goals of Western media creations, and possible conflict scenarios in the coming days and months.

According to Ambassador Arjan's report, Mohammadi pointed out that the security scene around Iran has reached its most complicated and ambiguous point in recent months and stated: In the methodology of information analysis, there is a fundamental difference between "enigma" (questions with specific answers that the enemy is aware of) and "ambiguity" (issues that are unanswered even in the minds of the enemy's highest leaders). The case of confronting Iran today is the biggest "strategic ambiguity" of the American intelligence community and the Zionist regime; Because there are deep divisions, conflicting analyzes and conflicting lobbies in the enemy's camp. Despite this confusion in the details, a complete consensus has formed among the intelligence agencies that "a new conflict is ahead"; Because the enemy feels that the project of hitting Iran is half-finished and the Islamic Republic will not stop until the full restoration of deterrence and settlement of past experiences.

He emphasizes that the severity of the warnings has increased significantly and there is a complete consensus among all sources and internal intelligence authorities that "conflict is coming" and there is no conflicting estimate to the contrary.

Mehdi Mohammadi points to recent operational signs in the occupied lands; including:

Moving and redeploying some missile defense systems inside Israel.

Prepare and reopen some shelters.

Propaganda creation by regime officials (such as Netanyahu and the regime's minister of war) about "possible pre-emptive attack by Iran", which they consider an attempt to justify their own aggressive operations.

America's hegemonic predicament and Trump's fear of electoral defeat

Explaining the dimensions of the pressure on the White House, Qalibaf's advisor stated: The situation has reached a dead end for Trump. The failure of the US military in previous wars, the unstoppability of Iran's missile power and defense, Tehran's decisive control over the Strait of Hormuz, and the expansion of coordination in Bab al-Mandab, have humiliated the 70-year legend of US maritime hegemony and the petrodollar regime. The "Deep State" in America feels that letting go of this honorable defeat means the end of Washington's military prestige in the world.

He added: On the other hand, the Strait of Hormuz crisis and the failure of the plan to collapse the value of the Rial have become the main Achilles heel of the Republican Party in the congressional elections. Trump has come to the conclusion that if there is no achievement, he will face heavy financial cases, impeachment and even accusations of war crimes; Therefore, it seeks to make an electoral victory maneuver with a limited strike on some of the nuclear facilities (such as the Natanz or Koh Klang sites) and immediately close the case. The continuous leak of information in the Western media about mortar bombs is also a sign of the internal power struggle between Democrats and Republicans to burn these operational scenarios.

the difference between the goals of Tel Aviv and Washington; Simulation of hellish nights in Tel Aviv

Explaining the strategic distinction between Netanyahu and Trump, Mohammadi noted: Netanyahu's goal is to expand the circle of conflict, contrary to Trump's desire for a limited and limited strike. He is trying to postpone the elections and revive subversive projects, terror and chaos by dragging the hits deep into the occupied lands. Field signs of the past hours, such as the relocation of defense systems and the preparation of shelters in Israel, indicate that the alert level has increased. The regime's propaganda line about "Iran's preemptive operations" is also designed precisely with the aim of legitimizing its possible adventure or diverting public opinion towards the Yemen front.

He emphasized: Iran, taking advantage of the experiences of the past 12-day and 40-day battles, this time will take a completely surprising response pattern without previous red lines, and if necessary, it will not hesitate to take preemptive action. Preparations are such that in case of aggression, there will be "nights of hell" in Tel Aviv to upset the accountants and planners in New York.

The enemy's miscalculation about the pickaxe and the fateful duality of fire and resilience

With a direct warning to the command rooms of the attacking coalition, this expert on strategic issues said: Trump thinks that by hitting parts of the nuclear program, he will hinder Iran's advanced capabilities; But the answer to the question, "What kind of reaction will be born from the attack on the nuclear program", is a matter that if the enemy is rational, he should be very afraid of it; Because Iran's strategic wisdom has taken its fundamental decisions.

In the end, Mohammadi pointed to the two main indicators of the enemy's observation and clarified: the aggressor's calculations are ultimately based on two axes: "Iran's will to fire" which will be definite and historical, and "social resilience inside". The control of currency fluctuations and the failure of the national currency devaluation project dealt a big blow to the estimates of war-seeking lobbies. What today is considered as the guarantor of national deterrence and the neutralization of the enemy's movements before reaching the decisive point (which may be the final confrontation in the winter) is the internal cohesion and the enthusiastic presence of the people in the country's arenas. This will impose the will of resistance on the enemy and make the costs of the invasion incalculable for the attackers.