Usulgra newspaper's criticism of a TV program: you have put three presenters in front of one guest / at least bring someone who can talk with Karbaschi
The appearance of a person like Karbaschi in a TV program and a debate between two different views is a defensible idea that I wish we would have seen on TV much sooner.
The appearance of a person like Karbaschi in a TV program and a debate between two different views is a defensible idea that I wish we would have seen on TV much sooner.
According to Ambassador Arjan, Khorasan newspaper wrote: Although Iran's program could not properly implement this idea as it should; The imbalance between the number of presenters and guests contributed to the one-sidedness of the discussion, and the three-to-one ratio of presenters with Kerbaschi ultimately failed to achieve the goal of this program, and most of the discussions were drawn into arguments to resolve a logical and well-founded doubt.
In this regard, it is important to state a few points:
1. I wish the experience of the program on Iran time and Kerbaschi's strange claims on live air will not send the idea of holding a debate in the programs to the archives of TV and Radio.
2. Not only in order to revive a part of its lost audience, Sadasima needs to create programs centered on creating debate and dialogue between political figures and elites; Rather, as the official media of the government, it has the duty to create a platform for confronting the conflicting thoughts and ideas that exist in order to inform the public.
3. The lack of such programs in recent years and one-sided platforms have trapped the radio and television in the endless cycle of one-sided comments by limited experts of this organization, it has actually caused the growth of different platforms in parallel with this organization, it has moved a part of the audience to foreign or virtual media, and the most dangerous thing is that this one-sided view in the radio and television, some views and opinions on the floor of the society (regardless of their correctness or incorrectness) not only in a logical space and Akalani did not discuss it, but reduced it to the subject of some humorous programs, which has angered some parts of the society.
4. Today, when, according to the country's officials, economic pressure and cognitive warfare have become a part of the enemy's strategy to create a gap in the society, keeping every Iranian in the circle of his national affairs is a part of national security. We don't need a uniform society; We need a united nation. If the hard core of Iran is supposed to be 90 million, the media of this core must also have the capacity to hear and represent 90 million Iranians.
Discussion between the presenter and Kerbaschi on the solution to the end of the war + film
Kerbaschi: Now fuel has become more expensive in America, what effect will it have on the lives of Iranian people and the country's economy...