One Statement, 29 Signatures: What Lies Behind the Unified Anti-Iran Chorus?

NATO's accusations against Iran in the Farfard case come as transatlantic disputes, contradictions in US policy, and the economic costs of Europe's alignment with Washington have intensified, a trend that could lead the Western alliance into a costly miscalculation with heavy consequences.

Ambassador Arjan-International Group: NATO is facing an unknown fate in the conflict between the two sides of the Atlantic, i.e. Europe and America; However, Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of this coalition, welcomed the statement of 29 allied and partner countries, declared his alignment with them and condemned Iran's alleged involvement in violent actions and threats against member countries, including the September 27 incident at the Royal Air Force Base "Fairford". He then claimed that NATO will continue to play its role to ensure the security of one billion people of the member countries.

These positions, which were raised after the signing of a statement condemning Iran's role in planning against the American Farford base in England and repeating the false claims of British Prime Minister Burnham about the possible role of agents under the guidance of the IRGC, take place while the Farford case is a symbol of the deterioration of American security on the one hand, and on the other hand, NATO's excuses can make this alliance fall into another miscalculation. A mistake that will have deadly costs for NATO, especially its European members.

Fairford; Unveiling America's security incompetence

Trump, the British authorities and now NATO are trying to whitewash America's crimes by accusing Iran of Iranphobia and creating an imaginary image of security by claiming to evacuate the base; The action on the eve of the election can be an indirect help to Trump and the crisis-stricken Netanyahu. However, there is an undeniable fact: America is facing serious questions even in securing its bases; So how does he want to play the role of savior for other countries?

On the other hand, these accusations increase the uncertainty surrounding Trump's claims about the destruction of Iran's military power. How does the United States, despite claiming to destroy Iran, bring all its domestic and foreign capacities, even NATO, to show Iran's threat? Farford is not a symbol of the West's unity against threats, but a sign of the security scandal of America and its allies; A scandal that does not go away with political atmosphere.

Scandal of the West; From good service to America to the economic crisis

The European members of NATO continue to serve the United States while Trump, breaking his commitments, announced an agreement with Putin to receive Russian diesel and at the same time called for elections in Ukraine. An action that could lead to the overthrow of Zelensky. On the other hand, Europe's cooperation with America against Iran has consequences that can make the economy and politics of this continent face a serious crisis.

The British Institute of Financial Studies has also warned that the sharp increase in inflation and government spending following the military aggression of the United States and the Zionist regime on Iran will pose a serious challenge to the country's budget. Another European scandal is the simultaneous application of 1,600 new sanctions against Russia with the continuation of this country's energy exports to the European Union; As Alexander Novak, the Deputy Prime Minister of Russia for energy affairs, has announced the value of energy resources exported to the European Union countries from 2022 until now at 320.7 billion dollars. In such a situation, accusing Iran is more than a sign of authority, it is an attempt to whitewash the contradictions and failures of the West; Contradictions that cannot be hidden by lying.

Rote; Claiming security or responding to aggression?

Rutte, who is such a protégé of Trump that he calls him "Daddy", has now taken the pose of securing the security of the West by accusing Iran; However, he must be accountable for NATO's performance in the illegal aggression of the US and the Zionist regime against Iran. How did the coalition, which is responsible for the security of its members against attacks on them, participate in the war against Iran with five thousand sorties?

Instead of sitting as a claimant, Rote should answer to the international community and human rights institutions about this performance. NATO's participation in aggression and violations of international law is a matter for follow-up in international forums and demand for accountability; Especially since the UN fact-finding committee has also acknowledged the dimensions of the crime against humanity. With fake claims, Rutte cannot change the place of the oppressor and the oppressed or justify the criminal nature of his actions, Trump and NATO.

NATO's miscalculation and Iran's new equation

The positions of Rutte and 28 countries, mainly European allies of the United States, along with Rubio's claims in Greece about a civilizational war against Iran's history and culture, show that NATO and Europe have once again entered America's game; A game that, from the Balkans and Afghanistan to Ukraine and the Ramadan war, has not achieved anything for the West, except for the economic and human costs.

It seems that Europe, in the conditions of global isolation, has joined this game with the Farford case in order to provide the ground for Trump and Netanyahu's electoral exploitation of Iranophobia and to justify new hostile measures, from military to economic, against Iran; A path for which historical experience has shown no end other than failure and scandal.

However, the United States, the Zionist regime, Europe and NATO, with whatever purpose they hide behind the Farford case, cannot change the course of global developments, especially in West Asia, in their favor. Accusations and military threats will not change the nature of Iran's behavior in managing the Strait of Hormuz. Iran will respond to threats by relying on new, broader and faster capacities than in the past. Bab al-Mandab still has a decisive position in the equations of resistance and under the control of Ansarullah, and the connection of these two straits can be calculated

make the aggressors face serious consequences. Those who read history not selectively, but with all its lessons and lessons, know very well that aggression against Iran will have no end other than defeat against the will of Iranians.