The reason for Abbas Araghchi's impeachment was two weeks in New York, according to 3 representatives/Araghchi. One day was enough to convey the message

While the names of 35 representatives who signed the impeachment motion of Abbas Araghchi have been published in the media, only a few of them agreed to talk.

Nilofar Moulai: August 1403, when the name of Abbas Araghchi was suggested as the proposed minister of foreign affairs by Masoud Bizikian, his opponents in the parliament were determined not to let him win the vote of confidence of the Baharstani people. The shouts of Amirhossein Sabeti, Tehran's representative from behind the platform of the public forum, have not yet been forgotten, when he played an old video of Araghchi's statements about the JCPOA and Trump's exit, saying: "Mr. Araghchi, Zarif, Salehi, Baidinjad and those who went there agreed and took coins, today they say that it was not us. So who was it?"

The claims that accompanied Araghchi's sarcastic response; "Mr. Sabeti, I do not say death to the homeland, which is my compatriot Araghchi; "I respect the country whose critic speaks without stuttering and even questions the legitimacy of the parliament."

Although the debate of that day was accompanied by the defeat of the senior advisor Saeed Jalili and Araghchi was able to go to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building on Sitir Street with the vote of the representatives, none of them imagined that in the first two years of the work of the 14th government, the country's government would be involved in a war with America and Israel, and national unity would become an important issue for the country's officials. Coherence is necessary not only between the people and their support for the government, but even the politicians should try to maintain it by avoiding discord.

An action that the friends of Saeed Jalili and the radical political spectrum not only did not pay attention to, but during the past few months, they resorted to any means to get the government out of business. The signing of the impeachment motion against Abbas Araghchi by 35 representatives and its uploading by Amirhossein Sabeti in the parliament system while the government is on a trip to New York is a seal of approval for this claim.

In the past days, Mahmoud Naboyan, the representative of Tehran in the parliament, published the names of the signatories of the impeachment motion of Abbas Araghchi, and so far the number of supporters of this impeachment is 35 people. Amir Hossein Shabiti, Ali Khadrian, Ruhollah Izadkhah, Abolfazl Zahravand, Mehdi Koochzadeh, Kamran Ghazanfari, Abolqasem Jarareh, Morteza Mahmoudi and Mahmoud Naboyan are 9 representatives who have signed this plan out of 30 Tehran representatives. However, following Ambassador Arjan's inquiries about their arguments for the impeachment of Araghchi, Mahmoudi, Naboiyan and Zahravand, they refused to talk. Hossein Ali Haji Deligani, the representative of Shahinshahr, also told Ambassador Arjan that his reasons are contained in the text of the impeachment motion of Abbas Araghchi.

In the meantime, Damghan representative Ali Akbar Alizadeh emphasized in a conversation with Ambassador Arjan that; "Mr. Qalibaf and the Honorable Majlis have not yet received the impeachment motion, and now this motion does not have much relevance."

Referring to the approval of JCPOA in the 11th government, Kamran Ghazanfari, the representative of Tehran, told Ambassador Arjan: "One of the clear and specific reasons for criticizing JCPOA supporters is that they never apologized to the people, did not apologize to the leadership, and did not ask for forgiveness for the damages they caused to the country due to the JCPOA agreement."

Also, Ambassador Arjan talked with four other MPs who signed Araghchi's impeachment motion the other day.

* In the following, you can read the detailed reasons of 3 MPs regarding the impeachment motion of Abbas Araghchi in the table below;

* One of the clear and specific reasons for criticizing the supporters of the JCPOA is that they never apologized to the people, did not apologize to the leadership, and did not ask for halalness for the damages they caused to the country due to the JCPOA agreement.

* Before traveling to New York, the same conditions of Article 7 were conveyed through intermediaries and they said that there is no need to go there again. However, Mr. Araqchi went there and stayed there for two weeks. The question is, why was he there for two weeks? Was he busy conveying Iran's message to the Americans or was he doing other things? I believe that it was enough to convey Iran's message to the Americans in one day, and one should ask what the meaning of his presence there was.

* The negotiators not only failed to stop the attacks of the Zionist regime on Lebanon, but these attacks intensified and a third of Lebanon's territory was occupied.

* We are in a situation where one of our serious strongholds in confronting the US and Israel, along with the General Staff of the Armed Forces, is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is one of the serious arms of the system in the war that is going on against us. Therefore, it is very important to help this ministry as much as possible and we know its importance.

* However, no matter how much we try to convince ourselves that the actions of our friends in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Araghchi personally are acceptable and in line with the interests of the country, I feel that we are putting hats on our heads. Day by day, we see the consequences and negative effects of their actions at the macro level of the country, in the military, economic and other sectors.

* Under the pretext that the war is going on somewhere else, we simply follow diplomacy, they raise the tension and we lower the tension, is an approach that unfortunately has its effects seen in the country.

* Mr. Ghalibaf and the Honorable Majlis have not received the impeachment motion yet. We have to see if they will deliver it or not. During the last two years, about 15 impeachment motions have been proposed and uploaded in the parliament. Only the impeachment of the Minister of Economy was announced as he has now become the head of the Central Bank.

* Therefore, the impeachment of Mr. Araghchi is not very important for now. If the impeachment takes place, then we will present our own words.