From Centcom's message to speculation about war ترامپ و نتانیاهو برای حمله به ایران تصمیم گرفتند؟ | پیوند احتمالی جنگ با بقای سیاسی نتانیاهو

Simultaneously with the increase of speculations about the possible escalation of tension between Iran, America and Israel, the statements of some media figures and the positions of the Central Command of the US Army have once again turned the possible time of the beginning of a new round of military confrontation into one of the topics of interest. Meanwhile, some claims about the political agreement between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu and its possible connection with planning to attack Iran raise questions.

According to Ambassador Arjan, in recent days, a series of statements and analyzes have been published about the possibility of joint military action by the US and Israel against Iran; Claims that still require independent evidence and more reliable information to be definitively confirmed.

Trump and Netanyahu decided to attack Iran?

Journalist Taqvinia has claimed that Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have decided to launch a joint attack against Iran. This claim is made in a situation where the security relations between Washington and Tel Aviv and the way the two sides face Tehran are still considered decisive factors in regional equations.

What is the "mother of all bombs" and why is its use against Iran controversial? | It is a war crime

Suspicious Israeli flights over Syria and Iraq Is Israel preparing to attack Iran?

Ground attack on neighboring countries Iran's new leaf against a possible American attack?

Will Iran make a preemptive attack before the US elections?

However, the mere publication of such a statement does not constitute an operational decision to start a war. It is not clear what information this claim is based on and whether there is any indication of a new military coordination between the two sides.

Centcom message; The ridiculous claim of weakening Iran's regional power

In the same atmosphere, the Central Command of the US Army, CENTCOM, has announced that it has weakened Iran's ability to exert power beyond its borders.

This stance can be seen as part of Washington's effort to highlight its military achievements against Iran. However, this statement alone does not indicate that the US has decided to start a new military operation.

At the same time, the emphasis on limiting Iran's regional power can indicate the continuation of the pressure strategy on Tehran; A strategy that, depending on the political and security conditions, may include economic pressure and military deterrence to wider operational measures.

Israeli elections and Netanyahu's survival equation

Another part of the raised speculations is related to the possible relationship between Netanyahu's political future and the Trump administration's regional policy. Some sources have claimed that Trump and Netanyahu have agreed to keep the Israeli prime minister in power, and the US president has pledged to support him.

Based on these claims, the possibility of attacking Iran before the Israeli elections may be a part of this political equation; A scenario that, if realized, could have consequences beyond the military field.

However, so far no independent evidence has been provided to prove the existence of such an agreement or its direct connection with the planning of an attack on Iran.

Is the region on the verge of a new round of war?

The combination of US military statements, claims of a joint decision by Washington and Tel Aviv, and speculations about Netanyahu's electoral considerations have increased the atmosphere of uncertainty.

Although these signs can indicate the continuation of pressure and military calculations against Iran, in order to conclude about the imminentness of the attack, it is necessary to pay attention to the reliable operational evidence, the official positions of the parties and developments in the field.

In such a situation, the most important question is whether the current pressures are only aimed at deterrence and political scoring, or will they become the basis for a new stage of military confrontation; A question whose answer depends on the decisions of Washington and Tel Aviv and Tehran's reaction.